Full stacked development describes the vertical inventory, while Cube development describes how that inventory is executed at the section level.
Cube Development vs. Full Stacked Development: What’s the Difference?


Full stacked development describes the vertical inventory, while Cube development describes how that inventory is executed at the section level.

FireBird Energy II’s COYOTE UNIT project offers a clear look at how modern Permian operators execute disciplined, small-footprint development programs without sacrificing speed or efficiency. Concentrated in Borden County and anchored by standardized Spraberry targeting, the project follows a factory-style workflow that moves cleanly from permitting through drilling and into production readiness.

HERBERT F101B highlights how Ovintiv executes small, well-defined Midland Basin developments with tight drilling cadence, single-rig batch execution, and clean regulatory close-out. Rather than a factory-style program, the four-well project reflects disciplined capital deployment where drilling, facilities, and permitting are tightly aligned to complete the development efficiently.

Diamondback’s Tier 1 Permian programs reflect section-scale factory development, concentrating 10–15 uniform horizontal wells per unit with dual-rig batch execution and centralized infrastructure. The consistent 8–9 month permit-to-facility cadence — with air permitting following drilling — confirms a mature, capital-efficient manufacturing model rather than exploratory or stacked-bench experimentation.

Diamondback’s MERCHANT EAST development in Reagan County reflects a disciplined Midland Basin factory model, with standardized horizontal Spraberry wells drilled across two contiguous sections using dual rigs and a tightly sequenced batch approach. From first permit to facility air approval, the 271-day cycle highlights a repeatable permit → drill → complete → centralize workflow designed for efficient, full-stack co-development and rapid transition to production.

Continental Resources’ Nobles White pad in Midland County is a fully permitted, factory-style shale development, with standardized horizontal wells, centralized surface infrastructure, and both well and facility approvals completed in advance of execution. With regulatory risk removed and permitting sequenced intentionally, the project now simply awaits drilling and completion to move efficiently from inventory to production.

Diamondback Energy executed a tightly concentrated, factory-style drilling program in Reagan County, combining single-section pad development, uniform horizontal well design, and a disciplined drilling cadence. From batch permitting to post-completion facility air permitting, the project reflects Grade A Permian execution focused on repeatability, efficiency, and production readiness rather than exploratory risk.

Exxon’s RICHARDS-GRISHAM lease demonstrates a true Permian factory model, with tightly batched permits, standardized well designs, predictable drilling cadence, and infrastructure timed precisely to move from execution to production. With identical geology, block position, and development logic, the adjacent EPLEY-GLASSCOCK lease is expected to follow the same repeatable manufacturing approach—making future activity a matter of scheduling, not subsurface risk.

Western Midstream Partners’ (NYSE: WES) newly announced restructuring of its Delaware Basin natural gas gathering agreements with Occidental Petroleum and ConocoPhillips is not simply a contract amendment. It is a clear example of how midstream infrastructure is being redesigned to support the next phase of Permian development.

Greenlake Energy’s Delaware Basin project in Reeves County is a clean example of how modern shale development has evolved into a manufacturing-style operation. This Wolfcamp-targeted pad development in the Phantom Field combines co-development planning with a delayed-completions development model, illustrating why projects like this can take a year or more…
