The management of vast quantities of wastewater from oil and gas drilling in New Mexico has sparked intense debate among regulators, industry advocates, and environmental groups. As the arid state faces severe water shortages, the question arises: Can treated produced water be a viable solution to New Mexico’s water crisis, or does it pose a significant threat to the state’s watersheds and public health? The recent public hearing shed light on this contentious issue, revealing diverse opinions and concerns about the future of water management in the region.

The issue of managing produced water from oil and gas drilling in New Mexico is a complex and contentious one, balancing potential benefits and risks. Here’s a summary of the key points from the recent public hearing:
Current Disposal Methods and Challenges
- Produced Water: Wastewater from drilling, extremely saline, and often containing hazardous chemicals.
- Current Disposal: Primarily injected underground, but linked to earthquakes. Some water is recycled for drilling.
- Quantity: Billions of gallons annually in an arid state with looming water shortages.
Proposed Rule by NMED
- Restrictions: Prohibits discharging treated produced water into bodies of water.
- Allowances: Permits reuse in industrial processes (e.g., hydrogen production, chemical manufacturing, power plant cooling).
- Concerns: NMED argues insufficient scientific data to ensure safety of discharges. Unknowns about water quality and treatment effectiveness.
- Pilot Projects: Continued research and pilot projects to study produced water treatment.
Positions and Testimonies
- Environmental Concerns:
- Risk of spills, accidents, and worker safety.
- Presence of toxic substances and inadequate data on treatment effectiveness.
- Advocacy for strict regulation or prohibition of reuse outside oilfields.
- Industry Perspective:
- Some argue the rule is too restrictive, potentially driving business to Texas.
- Calls for treating produced water similar to domestic wastewater.
- Advocates claim potential for treated water to supplement state’s water supply.
- Scientific Input:
- Mixed views on current treatment capabilities.
- Acknowledgement of ongoing research and the need for peer-reviewed data.
Comparisons with Other States
- Texas and Wyoming: More permissive in allowing produced water discharge.
- New Mexico’s Caution: More stringent due to potential risks and lack of comprehensive data.
Future Outlook
- Regulatory Process: Hearings continue, with final rule expected in late 2024 or early 2025.
- Potential Solutions:
- Further research on treatment technologies.
- Developing specific standards for produced water treatment and discharge.
- Exploring industrial reuse while ensuring environmental and public health safety.
Summary
The debate over produced water in New Mexico highlights a critical balance between utilizing a potential resource and protecting public health and the environment. The state’s cautious approach contrasts with neighboring states, reflecting the significant uncertainties and risks involved. The outcome of ongoing hearings and research will shape the future of water management in New Mexico’s oil and gas industry.